Security

[syzygy]

I know you get asked this regularly, but I’d like the opinion of the dev who knows how it all works under the hood.
I’d really like to use your tool, but I’m still weighing the investment in DMA against the security level of EFT/BE.
Does the DMA approach for this product really offer a significant step up in terms of security (avoiding bans) vs external ?

[Eliphas]

I dont forsee BattlEyes detections for DMA firmwares improving any time soon, so yes DMA with read only is 100% the safest way to cheat on EFT.

[randostar]

Happened to see this coming to the forums for another product but... to answer your question. Absolutely, yes. DMA is the long term approach if you want to continue hacking. It's more of an investment, naturally, but comes with fundamental benefits such as even harder to detect. With DMA it would be more likely that your playstyle gets you caught before the anti-cheat engine. Not to say it's impossible for the AC to get you, but this dev (SS) doesn't really have a history of ban waves or product compromise. Others have validated this and then some in the Discord too, which if you join, you'll probably find more help with the DMA questions. 

Good luck man! 

Edited August 14 by randostar